Materials Similar to Designing, validating, and contrasting conceptual quantum mechanics questions for spin states and spatial wave functions

home » Detail Page » Similar Materials

Materials Similar to Designing, validating, and contrasting conceptual quantum mechanics questions for spin states and spatial wave functions

39%: Student difficulties with quantum states while translating state vectors in Dirac notation to wave functions in position and momentum representations
37%: Development, validation and in-class evaluation of a sequence of clicker questions on Larmor precession of spin in quantum mechanics
35%: Approaches to data analysis of multiple-choice questions
34%: Design and validation of the Quantum Mechanics Conceptual Survey
31%: Item response theory analysis of the mechanics baseline test
30%: Validation and administration of a conceptual survey on the formalism and postulates of quantum mechanics
29%: Is the Force Concept Inventory Biased? Investigating Differential Item Functioning on a Test of Conceptual Learning in Physics
29%: Testing the development of student conceptual and visualization understanding in quantum mechanics through the undergraduate career
27%: Improving Students' Understanding of Quantum Mechanics
27%: Surveying students' understanding of quantum mechanics in one spatial dimension
26%: Criteria for collapsing rating scale responses: A case study of the CLASS
26%: Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism: Analysis of the items and recommendations for improvement
26%: Energy measurement resources in spins-first and position-first quantum mechanics
25%: Exploratory factor analysis of a Force Concept Inventory data set
25%: Student use of a material anchor for quantum wave functions
25%: What can normalized gain reveal about individual learning on the FCI?
25%: Identifying characteristics of pairs of questions that students answer similarly
25%: Multidimensional Item Response Theory and the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
25%: Assessing the assessment: Mutual information between response choices and factor scores