login - create an account - help

• AAPT ComPADRE
• Events
• Collaborate
• About
• Contact Us

Materials Similar to Multiple-choice Assessment for Upper-division Electricity and Magnetism

• 71%: Multiple-Response Assessment for Upper-division Electrodynamics
• 68%: Multiple roles of assessment in upper-division physics course reforms
• 66%: Applying Rasch theory to evaluate the construct validity of brief electricity and magnetism assessment
• 64%: A Research-Based Approach to Assessing Student Learning Issues in Upper-Division Electricity & Magnetism
• 60%: Coupled multiple-response versus free-response conceptual assessment: An example from upper-division physics
• 60%: Constructing a Multiple-choice Assessment for Upper-division Quantum Physics from an Open-ended Tool
• 54%: Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism: Analysis of the items and recommendations for improvement
• 50%: Transforming Upper-Division Quantum Mechanics: Learning Goals and Assessment
• 50%: Colorado Upper-Division Electrostatics diagnostic: A conceptual assessment for the junior level
• 50%: Assessing the assessment: Mutual information between response choices and factor scores
• 49%: Assessment feedback: A tool to promote scientific practices in upper-division
• 47%: Colorado Upper Division Electrostatics (CUE) Assessment
• 47%: Multiple-choice test of energy and momentum concepts
• 45%: But Does It Last? Sustaining a Research-Based Curriculum in Upper-Division Electricity & Magnetism
• 45%: Assessing students’ conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism
• 45%: Methodological development of a new coding scheme for an established assessment on measurement uncertainty in laboratory courses
• 45%: Tapping into Juniors’ Understanding of E&M: The Colorado Upper-Division Electrostatics (CUE) Diagnostic
• 44%: Revealing Differences Between Curricula Using the Colorado Upper-Division Electrostatics Diagnostic
• 44%: Resource Letter RBAI-1: Research-Based Assessment Instruments in Physics and Astronomy