login
-
create an account
-
help
AAPT ComPADRE
Events
Collaborate
About
Contact Us
home
»
Detail Page
» Similar Materials
Materials Similar to
FCI normalized gain, scientific reasoning ability, thinking in physics, and gender effects
64%
:
Interpreting FCI scores: Normalized gain, preinstruction scores, and scientific reasoning ability
41%
:
Predicting FCI gain with a nonverbal intelligence test
39%
:
Learning of content knowledge and development of scientific reasoning ability: A cross culture comparison
38%
:
Reducing the FCI Gender Gap
37%
:
Comparing Traditional and Studio Courses through FCI Gains and Losses
36%
:
Gender disparities in second-semester college physics: The incremental effects of a "smog of bias"
36%
:
What can normalized gain reveal about individual learning on the FCI?
36%
:
Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for Force Concept Inventory results in an introductory mechanics course
35%
:
Development and validation of a scientific (formal) reasoning test for college students
35%
:
Gender bias in the force concept inventory?
35%
:
Gender Differences in Learning of the Concept of Force, Representational Consistency, and Scientific Reasoning
33%
:
Preliminary investigation of instructor effects on gender gap in introductory physics
33%
:
Making classroom assessment more accountable to scientific reasoning: A case for attending to mechanistic thinking
33%
:
Evaluating students’ performance on the FCI at a minority serving institution
32%
:
A comparison of the impact of 3 forms of "hands-on" activities for learners with different scientific reasoning abilities
32%
:
Effect of gender, self-efficacy, and interest on perception of the learning environment and outcomes in calculus-based introductory physics courses
31%
:
Differences in Male/Female Response Patterns on Alternative-format Versions of the Force Concept Inventory
31%
:
Developing a magnetism conceptual survey and assessing gender differences in student understanding of magnetism
31%
:
Replicating a self-affirmation intervention to address gender differences: Successes and challenges