written by
Michael J. Prince and Richard M. Felder
Traditional engineering instruction is deductive, beginning with theories and progressing to the applications of those theories. Alternative teaching approaches are more inductive. Topics are introduced by presenting specific observations, case studies or problems, and theories are taught or the students are helped to discover them only after the need to know them has been established. This study reviews several of the most commonly used inductive teaching methods, including inquiry learning, problem-based learning, project-based learning, case-based teaching, discovery learning, and just-in time teaching. The paper defines each method, highlights commonalities and specific differences, and reviews research on the effectiveness of the methods. While the strength of the evidence varies from one method to another, inductive methods are consistently found to be at least equal to, and in general more effective than, traditional deductive methods for achieving a broad range of learning outcomes.
Journal of Engineering Education: Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages 123-138
ComPADRE is beta testing Citation Styles!
Record Link
<a href="https://www.compadre.org/portal/items/detail.cfm?ID=3593">Prince, Michael J., and Richard Felder. "Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases." J. Eng. Educ. 95, no. 2, (April 1, 2006): 123-138.</a>
AIP Format
M. Prince and R. Felder, , J. Eng. Educ. 95 (2), 123 (2006), WWW Document, (https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x).
AJP/PRST-PER
M. Prince and R. Felder, Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases, J. Eng. Educ. 95 (2), 123 (2006), <https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x>.
APA Format
Prince, M., & Felder, R. (2006, April 1). Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases. J. Eng. Educ., 95(2), 123-138. Retrieved October 8, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x
Chicago Format
Prince, Michael J., and Richard Felder. "Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases." J. Eng. Educ. 95, no. 2, (April 1, 2006): 123-138, https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x (accessed 8 October 2024).
MLA Format
Prince, Michael J., and Richard Felder. "Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases." J. Eng. Educ. 95.2 (2006): 123-138. 8 Oct. 2024 <https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x>.
BibTeX Export Format
@article{
Author = "Michael J. Prince and Richard Felder",
Title = {Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases},
Journal = {J. Eng. Educ.},
Volume = {95},
Number = {2},
Pages = {123-138},
Month = {April},
Year = {2006}
}
Refer Export Format
%A Michael J. Prince %A Richard Felder %T Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases %J J. Eng. Educ. %V 95 %N 2 %D April 1, 2006 %P 123-138 %U https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x %O text/html
EndNote Export Format
%0 Journal Article %A Prince, Michael J. %A Felder, Richard %D April 1, 2006 %T Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases %J J. Eng. Educ. %V 95 %N 2 %P 123-138 %8 April 1, 2006 %@ 1069-4730 %U https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x Disclaimer: ComPADRE offers citation styles as a guide only. We cannot offer interpretations about citations as this is an automated procedure. Please refer to the style manuals in the Citation Source Information area for clarifications.
Citation Source Information
The AIP Style presented is based on information from the AIP Style Manual. The APA Style presented is based on information from APA Style.org: Electronic References. The Chicago Style presented is based on information from Examples of Chicago-Style Documentation. The MLA Style presented is based on information from the MLA FAQ. |
ContributeSimilar Materials |