Detail Page

Characterising STEM Ways of Thinking in Engineering Design (ED)-based tasks
written by Ravishankar Chatta Subramaniam, Caden LaFontaine, Amir Bralin, Jason W. Morphew, Carina M. Rebello, and N. Sanjay Rebello
Investigating students' thinking in routine classroom tasks, especially in science and engineering, is crucial. Given the rising interest in STEM Ways of Thinking (SWoT), in this exploratory study, we focus on two multi-week Engineering Design tasks within an undergraduate physics laboratory. Given that the term 'ways of thinking' has varied interpretations, we aim to further the discourse by identifying four SWoTs: Design Thinking, Physics Concepts, Mathematical Constructs, and Metacognitive Reflection. Analyzing discussions from 14 student-groups reveals notable differences in how students solve an instructor-assigned challenge given earlier in the semester and a student-generated challenge later in the semester. Students considered physics concepts more frequently and combined mathematical and physics concepts in more detail in the latter task. Our findings underscore the value of small-group discussions in understanding and operationalizing SWoT. We acknowledge the need for diverse frameworks and believe our study can benefit educators and researchers exploring similar strategies.
Physics Education Research Conference 2024
Part of the PER Conference series
Boston, MA: July 10-11, 2024
Pages 90-96
Subjects Levels Resource Types
Education Foundations
- Behavior
= Behavior Development
- Cognition
= Cognition Development
Education Practices
- Active Learning
= Cooperative Learning
- Instructional Material Design
= Activity
Other Sciences
- Engineering
- Lower Undergraduate
- Reference Material
= Research study
Intended Users Formats Ratings
- Researchers
- application/pdf
  • Currently 0.0/5

Want to rate this material?
Login here!


Mirror:
https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2024…
Access Rights:
Free access
License:
This material is released under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the published article's author(s), title, proceedings citation, and DOI.
Rights Holder:
American Association of Physics Teachers
DOI:
10.1119/perc.2024.pr.Chatta_Subramaniam
NSF Number:
2021389
Keyword:
PERC 2024
Record Creator:
Metadata instance created September 6, 2024 by Lyle Barbato
Record Updated:
September 12, 2024 by Lyle Barbato
Last Update
when Cataloged:
September 12, 2024
Other Collections:

ComPADRE is beta testing Citation Styles!

Record Link
AIP Format
R. Chatta Subramaniam, C. LaFontaine, A. Bralin, J. Morphew, C. Rebello, and N. Rebello, , presented at the Physics Education Research Conference 2024, Boston, MA, 2024, WWW Document, (https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=16877&DocID=5944).
AJP/PRST-PER
R. Chatta Subramaniam, C. LaFontaine, A. Bralin, J. Morphew, C. Rebello, and N. Rebello, Characterising STEM Ways of Thinking in Engineering Design (ED)-based tasks, presented at the Physics Education Research Conference 2024, Boston, MA, 2024, <https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=16877&DocID=5944>.
APA Format
Chatta Subramaniam, R., LaFontaine, C., Bralin, A., Morphew, J., Rebello, C., & Rebello, N. (2024, July 10-11). Characterising STEM Ways of Thinking in Engineering Design (ED)-based tasks. Paper presented at Physics Education Research Conference 2024, Boston, MA. Retrieved July 20, 2025, from https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=16877&DocID=5944
Chicago Format
Chatta Subramaniam, R, C. LaFontaine, A. Bralin, J. Morphew, C. Rebello, and N. Rebello. "Characterising STEM Ways of Thinking in Engineering Design (ED)-based tasks." Paper presented at the Physics Education Research Conference 2024, Boston, MA, July 10-11, 2024. https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=16877&DocID=5944 (accessed 20 July 2025).
MLA Format
Chatta Subramaniam, Ravishankar, Caden LaFontaine, Amir Bralin, Jason Morphew, Carina Rebello, and N. Sanjay Rebello. "Characterising STEM Ways of Thinking in Engineering Design (ED)-based tasks." Physics Education Research Conference 2024. Boston, MA: 2024. 90-96 of PER Conference. 20 July 2025 <https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=16877&DocID=5944>.
BibTeX Export Format
@inproceedings{ Author = "Ravishankar Chatta Subramaniam and Caden LaFontaine and Amir Bralin and Jason Morphew and Carina Rebello and N. Sanjay Rebello", Title = {Characterising STEM Ways of Thinking in Engineering Design (ED)-based tasks}, BookTitle = {Physics Education Research Conference 2024}, Pages = {90-96}, Address = {Boston, MA}, Series = {PER Conference}, Month = {July 10-11}, Year = {2024} }
Refer Export Format

%A Ravishankar Chatta Subramaniam %A Caden LaFontaine %A Amir Bralin %A Jason Morphew %A Carina Rebello %A N. Sanjay Rebello %T Characterising STEM Ways of Thinking in Engineering Design (ED)-based tasks %S PER Conference %D July 10-11 2024 %P 90-96 %C Boston, MA %U https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=16877&DocID=5944 %O Physics Education Research Conference 2024 %O July 10-11 %O application/pdf

EndNote Export Format

%0 Conference Proceedings %A Chatta Subramaniam, Ravishankar %A LaFontaine, Caden %A Bralin, Amir %A Morphew, Jason %A Rebello, Carina %A Rebello, N. Sanjay %D July 10-11 2024 %T Characterising STEM Ways of Thinking in Engineering Design (ED)-based tasks %B Physics Education Research Conference 2024 %C Boston, MA %P 90-96 %S PER Conference %8 July 10-11 %U https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=16877&DocID=5944


Disclaimer: ComPADRE offers citation styles as a guide only. We cannot offer interpretations about citations as this is an automated procedure. Please refer to the style manuals in the Citation Source Information area for clarifications.

Citation Source Information

The AIP Style presented is based on information from the AIP Style Manual.

The APA Style presented is based on information from APA Style.org: Electronic References.

The Chicago Style presented is based on information from Examples of Chicago-Style Documentation.

The MLA Style presented is based on information from the MLA FAQ.

Characterising STEM Ways of Thinking in Engineering Design (ED)-based tasks:


Know of another related resource? Login to relate this resource to it.
Save to my folders

Contribute

Related Materials

Similar Materials