written by
Onofrio Rosario Battaglia, Benedetto Di Paola, and Claudio Fazio
[This paper is part of the Focused Collection on Quantitative Methods in PER: A Critical Examination.] A relevant aim of research in education is to find and study the reasoning lines that students deploy when dealing with problematic situations. This can be done through an analysis of the answers students give to a questionnaire. In this paper, we discuss some methodological aspects involved in the quantitative analysis of a questionnaire by means of two different clustering methods, a hierarchical one and a nonhierarchical one. We start from the coding procedures needed to obtain analyzable data from the questionnaire and from a definition of a correlation coefficient suitable for measuring student similarity in the case of binary coding of student answers. Then, criteria to choose the optimal number of clusters are discussed, and for the same purpose a new coefficient is introduced that measures the total amount of information we can obtain from a clustering solution. We show that each cluster can be characterized by its centroid that summarizes the answers most frequently given by the cluster students to the questionnaire. Finally, an example of the application of these procedures to a student sample is given, and a comparison between the two clustering methods is discussed.
See Related Materials (right menu) for a link to the full collection on quantitative methods in PER.
Physical Review Physics Education Research: Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 020112
ComPADRE is beta testing Citation Styles!
Record Link
<a href="https://www.compadre.org/portal/items/detail.cfm?ID=15151">Battaglia, O, B. Di Paola, and C. Fazio. "Unsupervised quantitative methods to analyze student reasoning lines: Theoretical aspects and examples." Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15, no. 2, (July 3, 2019): 020112.</a>
AIP Format
O. Battaglia, B. Di Paola, and C. Fazio, , Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15 (2), 020112 (2019), WWW Document, (https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020112).
AJP/PRST-PER
O. Battaglia, B. Di Paola, and C. Fazio, Unsupervised quantitative methods to analyze student reasoning lines: Theoretical aspects and examples, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15 (2), 020112 (2019), <https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020112>.
APA Format
Battaglia, O., Di Paola, B., & Fazio, C. (2019, July 3). Unsupervised quantitative methods to analyze student reasoning lines: Theoretical aspects and examples. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., 15(2), 020112. Retrieved January 24, 2025, from https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020112
Chicago Format
Battaglia, O, B. Di Paola, and C. Fazio. "Unsupervised quantitative methods to analyze student reasoning lines: Theoretical aspects and examples." Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15, no. 2, (July 3, 2019): 020112, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020112 (accessed 24 January 2025).
MLA Format
Battaglia, Onofrio, Benedetto Di Paola, and Claudio Fazio. "Unsupervised quantitative methods to analyze student reasoning lines: Theoretical aspects and examples." Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15.2 (2019): 020112. 24 Jan. 2025 <https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020112>.
BibTeX Export Format
@article{
Author = "Onofrio Battaglia and Benedetto Di Paola and Claudio Fazio",
Title = {Unsupervised quantitative methods to analyze student reasoning lines: Theoretical aspects and examples},
Journal = {Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.},
Volume = {15},
Number = {2},
Pages = {020112},
Month = {July},
Year = {2019}
}
Refer Export Format
%A Onofrio Battaglia %A Benedetto Di Paola %A Claudio Fazio %T Unsupervised quantitative methods to analyze student reasoning lines: Theoretical aspects and examples %J Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. %V 15 %N 2 %D July 3, 2019 %P 020112 %U https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020112 %O application/pdf
EndNote Export Format
%0 Journal Article %A Battaglia, Onofrio %A Di Paola, Benedetto %A Fazio, Claudio %D July 3, 2019 %T Unsupervised quantitative methods to analyze student reasoning lines: Theoretical aspects and examples %J Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. %V 15 %N 2 %P 020112 %8 July 3, 2019 %U https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020112 Disclaimer: ComPADRE offers citation styles as a guide only. We cannot offer interpretations about citations as this is an automated procedure. Please refer to the style manuals in the Citation Source Information area for clarifications.
Citation Source Information
The AIP Style presented is based on information from the AIP Style Manual. The APA Style presented is based on information from APA Style.org: Electronic References. The Chicago Style presented is based on information from Examples of Chicago-Style Documentation. The MLA Style presented is based on information from the MLA FAQ. Unsupervised quantitative methods to analyze student reasoning lines: Theoretical aspects and examples:
Is Part Of
Focused Collection of Physical Review PER: Quantitative Methods in PER: A Critical Examination
A link to the full collection in which this article appears: Quantitative Methods in PER: A Critical Examination relation by Caroline HallKnow of another related resource? Login to relate this resource to it. |
ContributeRelated MaterialsSimilar Materials |