written by
Andreas Lichtenberger, C. Wagner, S. I. Hofer, Elsbeth Stern, and Andreas Vaterlaus
The kinematics concept test (KCT) is a multiple-choice test designed to evaluate students' conceptual understanding of kinematics at the high school level. The test comprises 49 multiple-choice items about velocity and acceleration, which are based on seven kinematic concepts and which make use of three different representations. In the first part of this article we describe the development and the validation process of the KCT. We applied the KCT to 338 Swiss high school students who attended traditional teaching in kinematics. We analyzed the response data to provide the psychometric properties of the test. In the second part we present the results of a structural analysis of the test. An exploratory factor analysis of 664 student answers finally uncovered the seven kinematics concepts as factors. However, the analysis revealed a hierarchical structure of concepts. At the higher level, mathematical concepts group together, and then split up into physics concepts at the lower level. Furthermore, students who seem to understand a concept in one representation have difficulties transferring the concept to similar problems in another representation. Both results have implications for teaching kinematics. First, teaching mathematical concepts beforehand might be beneficial for learning kinematics. Second, instructions have to be designed to teach students the change between different representations.
Physical Review Physics Education Research: Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 010115
ComPADRE is beta testing Citation Styles!
Record Link
<a href="https://www.compadre.org/portal/items/detail.cfm?ID=14351">Lichtenberger, A, C. Wagner, S. Hofer, E. Stern, and A. Vaterlaus. "Validation and structural analysis of the kinematics concept test." Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 13, no. 1, (April 10, 2017): 010115.</a>
AIP Format
A. Lichtenberger, C. Wagner, S. Hofer, E. Stern, and A. Vaterlaus, , Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 13 (1), 010115 (2017), WWW Document, (https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010115).
AJP/PRST-PER
A. Lichtenberger, C. Wagner, S. Hofer, E. Stern, and A. Vaterlaus, Validation and structural analysis of the kinematics concept test, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 13 (1), 010115 (2017), <https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010115>.
APA Format
Lichtenberger, A., Wagner, C., Hofer, S., Stern, E., & Vaterlaus, A. (2017, April 10). Validation and structural analysis of the kinematics concept test. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., 13(1), 010115. Retrieved September 16, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010115
Chicago Format
Lichtenberger, A, C. Wagner, S. Hofer, E. Stern, and A. Vaterlaus. "Validation and structural analysis of the kinematics concept test." Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 13, no. 1, (April 10, 2017): 010115, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010115 (accessed 16 September 2024).
MLA Format
Lichtenberger, Andreas, C. Wagner, S. I. Hofer, Elsbeth Stern, and Andreas Vaterlaus. "Validation and structural analysis of the kinematics concept test." Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 13.1 (2017): 010115. 16 Sep. 2024 <https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010115>.
BibTeX Export Format
@article{
Author = "Andreas Lichtenberger and C. Wagner and S. I. Hofer and Elsbeth Stern and Andreas Vaterlaus",
Title = {Validation and structural analysis of the kinematics concept test},
Journal = {Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.},
Volume = {13},
Number = {1},
Pages = {010115},
Month = {April},
Year = {2017}
}
Refer Export Format
%A Andreas Lichtenberger %A C. Wagner %A S. I. Hofer %A Elsbeth Stern %A Andreas Vaterlaus %T Validation and structural analysis of the kinematics concept test %J Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. %V 13 %N 1 %D April 10, 2017 %P 010115 %U https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010115 %O application/pdf
EndNote Export Format
%0 Journal Article %A Lichtenberger, Andreas %A Wagner, C. %A Hofer, S. I. %A Stern, Elsbeth %A Vaterlaus, Andreas %D April 10, 2017 %T Validation and structural analysis of the kinematics concept test %J Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. %V 13 %N 1 %P 010115 %8 April 10, 2017 %U https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010115 Disclaimer: ComPADRE offers citation styles as a guide only. We cannot offer interpretations about citations as this is an automated procedure. Please refer to the style manuals in the Citation Source Information area for clarifications.
Citation Source Information
The AIP Style presented is based on information from the AIP Style Manual. The APA Style presented is based on information from APA Style.org: Electronic References. The Chicago Style presented is based on information from Examples of Chicago-Style Documentation. The MLA Style presented is based on information from the MLA FAQ. |