Detail Page

Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research
Comparative study of the effectiveness of three learning environments: Hyper-realistic virtual simulations, traditional schematic simulations and traditional laboratory
written by Guadalupe Martínez, Francisco L. Naranjo, Ángel L. Pérez, Maria Isabel Suero, and Pedro J. Pardo
This study compared the educational effects of computer simulations developed in a hyper-realistic virtual environment with the educational effects of either traditional schematic simulations or a traditional optics laboratory. The virtual environment was constructed on the basis of Java applets complemented with a photorealistic visual output. This new virtual environment concept, which we call hyper-realistic, transcends basic schematic simulation; it provides the user with a more realistic perception of a physical phenomenon being simulated. We compared the learning achievements of three equivalent, homogeneous groups of undergraduates--an experimental group who used only the hyper-realistic virtual laboratory, a first control group who used a schematic simulation, and a second control group who used the traditional laboratory. The three groups received the same theoretical preparation and carried out equivalent practicals in their respective learning environments. The topic chosen for the experiment was optical aberrations. An analysis of variance applied to the data of the study demonstrated a statistically significant difference (p value <0.05) between the three groups. The learning achievements attained by the group using the hyper-realistic virtual environment were 6.1 percentage points higher than those for the group using the traditional schematic simulations and 9.5 percentage points higher than those for the group using the traditional laboratory.
1 supplemental document is available
1 source code document is available
Subjects Levels Resource Types
Education Foundations
- Assessment
Education Practices
- Curriculum Development
= Laboratory
- Instructional Material Design
= Simulation
- Pedagogy
- Technology
= Computers
= Multimedia
- Lower Undergraduate
- Graduate/Professional
- Reference Material
= Research study
Intended Users Formats Ratings
- Researchers
- application/pdf
  • Currently 5.0/5

Rated 5.0 stars by 1 person

Want to rate this material?
Login here!


Mirror:
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevST…
Access Rights:
Free access
License:
This material is released under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.
Rights Holder:
American Physical Society
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020111
PACSs:
01.40.Fk
01.50.Lc
Keywords:
hyper-realistic virtual environment, schematic simulations, traditional laboratory
Record Creator:
Metadata instance created April 30, 2012 by Lyle Barbato
Record Updated:
August 12, 2016 by Lyle Barbato
Last Update
when Cataloged:
October 31, 2011
Other Collections:

ComPADRE is beta testing Citation Styles!

Record Link
AIP Format
G. Martínez, F. Naranjo, Á. Pérez, M. Suero, and P. Pardo, , Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7 (2), 020111 (2011), WWW Document, (https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=11931&DocID=2878).
AJP/PRST-PER
G. Martínez, F. Naranjo, Á. Pérez, M. Suero, and P. Pardo, Comparative study of the effectiveness of three learning environments: Hyper-realistic virtual simulations, traditional schematic simulations and traditional laboratory, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7 (2), 020111 (2011), <https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=11931&DocID=2878>.
APA Format
Martínez, G., Naranjo, F., Pérez, Á., Suero, M., & Pardo, P. (2011, October 31). Comparative study of the effectiveness of three learning environments: Hyper-realistic virtual simulations, traditional schematic simulations and traditional laboratory. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res., 7(2), 020111. Retrieved December 6, 2024, from https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=11931&DocID=2878
Chicago Format
Martínez, G, F. Naranjo, Á. Pérez, M. Suero, and P. Pardo. "Comparative study of the effectiveness of three learning environments: Hyper-realistic virtual simulations, traditional schematic simulations and traditional laboratory." Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7, no. 2, (October 31, 2011): 020111, https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=11931&DocID=2878 (accessed 6 December 2024).
MLA Format
Martínez, Guadalupe, Francisco Naranjo, Ángel Pérez, Maria Isabel Suero, and Pedro Pardo. "Comparative study of the effectiveness of three learning environments: Hyper-realistic virtual simulations, traditional schematic simulations and traditional laboratory." Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7.2 (2011): 020111. 6 Dec. 2024 <https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=11931&DocID=2878>.
BibTeX Export Format
@article{ Author = "Guadalupe Martínez and Francisco Naranjo and Ángel Pérez and Maria Isabel Suero and Pedro Pardo", Title = {Comparative study of the effectiveness of three learning environments: Hyper-realistic virtual simulations, traditional schematic simulations and traditional laboratory}, Journal = {Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.}, Volume = {7}, Number = {2}, Pages = {020111}, Month = {October}, Year = {2011} }
Refer Export Format

%A Guadalupe Martínez %A Francisco Naranjo %A Ángel Pérez %A Maria Isabel Suero %A Pedro Pardo %T Comparative study of the effectiveness of three learning environments: Hyper-realistic virtual simulations, traditional schematic simulations and traditional laboratory %J Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. %V 7 %N 2 %D October 31, 2011 %P 020111 %U https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=11931&DocID=2878 %O application/pdf

EndNote Export Format

%0 Journal Article %A Martínez, Guadalupe %A Naranjo, Francisco %A Pérez, Ángel %A Suero, Maria Isabel %A Pardo, Pedro %D October 31, 2011 %T Comparative study of the effectiveness of three learning environments: Hyper-realistic virtual simulations, traditional schematic simulations and traditional laboratory %J Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. %V 7 %N 2 %P 020111 %8 October 31, 2011 %U https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=11931&DocID=2878


Disclaimer: ComPADRE offers citation styles as a guide only. We cannot offer interpretations about citations as this is an automated procedure. Please refer to the style manuals in the Citation Source Information area for clarifications.

Citation Source Information

The AIP Style presented is based on information from the AIP Style Manual.

The APA Style presented is based on information from APA Style.org: Electronic References.

The Chicago Style presented is based on information from Examples of Chicago-Style Documentation.

The MLA Style presented is based on information from the MLA FAQ.

This resource and its subdocuments is stored in 1 shared folders.

You must login to access shared folders.

Comparative study of the effectiveness of three learning environments: Hyper-realistic virtual simulations, traditional schematic simulations and traditional laboratory:

Is Based On Easy Java Simulations Modeling and Authoring Tool

The Easy Java Simulations Modeling and Authoring Tool is needed to explore the computational model used in the Comparative study of the effectiveness of three learning environments: Hyper-realistic virtual simulations, traditional schematic simulations and traditional laboratory.

relation by Wolfgang Christian

Know of another related resource? Login to relate this resource to it.
Save to my folders

Contribute

Related Materials

Similar Materials