This is the second article in a series of three reviews of three standard mathematical productivity packages. This article describes the use of mathematics packages for undergraduate education. The features, functions, and interfaces are reviewed in context of educational applications. Three specific applications, simulations, tutorials, and programming are considered here.
The magazine editors would like feedback from readers of this article. Please complete the brief survey at http://www.aip.org/statistics/cise
N. Chonacky and D. Winch, 3Ms for Instruction: Reviews of Maple, Mathematica, and Matlab, Comp. Sci. Eng. 7 (3), 7 (2005), <https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2005.43>.
Chonacky, N., & Winch, D. (2005, May 1). 3Ms for Instruction: Reviews of Maple, Mathematica, and Matlab. Comp. Sci. Eng., 7(3), 7 - 13. Retrieved December 9, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2005.43
%0 Journal Article %A Chonacky, Norman %A Winch, David %D May 1, 2005 %T 3Ms for Instruction: Reviews of Maple, Mathematica, and Matlab %J Comp. Sci. Eng. %V 7 %N 3 %P 7 - 13 %8 May 1, 2005 %U https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2005.43
Disclaimer: ComPADRE offers citation styles as a guide only. We cannot offer interpretations about citations as this is an automated procedure. Please refer to the style manuals in the Citation Source Information area for clarifications.
This third article in the series provides a direct comparison between the features, interfaces, and methods of the mathematical packages in light of educational uses.
Record Link
Save to my folders