APS Excellence in Physics Education Award
November 2019

Education Prize Logo
Science SPORE Prize
November 2011

NSF Logo
The Open Source Physics Project is supported by NSF DUE-0442581.

Journal Article Detail Page

CBE-Life Sciences Education

This ComPADRE record has not been chosen for inclusion into the Open Source Physics collection. If you feel this record should be included, you may contact the editor using our feedback form.

written by Travis Lund, Matthew Pilarz, Jonathan Velasco, Devasmita Chakraverty, Kaitlyn Rosploch, Molly Undersander, and Marilyne Stains
Researchers, university administrators, and faculty members are increasingly interested in measuring and describing instructional practices provided in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses at the college level. Specifically, there is keen interest in comparing instructional practices between courses, monitoring changes over time, and mapping observed practices to research-based teaching. While increasingly common observation protocols (Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol [RTOP] and Classroom Observation Protocol in Undergraduate STEM [COPUS]) at the postsecondary level help achieve some of these goals, they also suffer from weaknesses that limit their applicability. In this study, we leverage the strengths of these protocols to provide an easy method that enables the reliable and valid characterization of instructional practices. This method was developed empirically via a cluster analysis using observations of 269 individual class periods, corresponding to 73 different faculty members, 28 different research-intensive institutions, and various STEM disciplines. Ten clusters, called COPUS profiles, emerged from this analysis; they represent the most common types of instructional practices enacted in the classrooms observed for this study. RTOP scores were used to validate the alignment of the 10 COPUS profiles with reformed teaching. Herein, we present a detailed description of the cluster analysis method, the COPUS profiles, and the distribution of the COPUS profiles across various STEM courses at research-intensive universities.
CBE-Life Sciences Education: Volume 14, Issue 2
Subjects Levels Resource Types
Education Foundations
- Assessment
= Instruments
- Sample Population
= Instructor: Faculty
- Teacher Characteristics
- Lower Undergraduate
- Graduate/Professional
- Upper Undergraduate
- Reference Material
= Article
= Research study
Intended Users Formats Ratings
- Researchers
- Administrators
- Educators
- application/pdf
- text/html
  • Currently 0.0/5

Want to rate this material?
Login here!


Access Rights:
Free access
License:
This material is released under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 license.
Rights Holder:
T.J. Lund et al., and American Society for Cell Biology
Keywords:
reformed teaching, teaching observation
Record Creator:
Metadata instance created July 10, 2018 by Bruce Mason
Record Updated:
July 10, 2018 by Bruce Mason
Other Collections:

ComPADRE is beta testing Citation Styles!

Record Link
AIP Format
T. Lund, M. Pilarz, J. Velasco, D. Chakraverty, K. Rosploch, M. Undersander, and M. Stains, , CBE Life. Sci. Educ. 14 (2), (2017), WWW Document, (https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-10-0168).
AJP/PRST-PER
T. Lund, M. Pilarz, J. Velasco, D. Chakraverty, K. Rosploch, M. Undersander, and M. Stains, The Best of Both Worlds: Building on the COPUS and RTOP Observation Protocols to Easily and Reliably Measure Various Levels of Reformed Instructional Practice, CBE Life. Sci. Educ. 14 (2), (2017), <https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-10-0168>.
APA Format
Lund, T., Pilarz, M., Velasco, J., Chakraverty, D., Rosploch, K., Undersander, M., & Stains, M. (2017). The Best of Both Worlds: Building on the COPUS and RTOP Observation Protocols to Easily and Reliably Measure Various Levels of Reformed Instructional Practice. CBE Life. Sci. Educ., 14(2). Retrieved June 22, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-10-0168
Chicago Format
Lund, T, M. Pilarz, J. Velasco, D. Chakraverty, K. Rosploch, M. Undersander, and M. Stains. "The Best of Both Worlds: Building on the COPUS and RTOP Observation Protocols to Easily and Reliably Measure Various Levels of Reformed Instructional Practice." CBE Life. Sci. Educ. 14, no. 2, (2017), https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-10-0168 (accessed 22 June 2024).
MLA Format
Lund, Travis, Matthew Pilarz, Jonathan Velasco, Devasmita Chakraverty, Kaitlyn Rosploch, Molly Undersander, and Marilyne Stains. "The Best of Both Worlds: Building on the COPUS and RTOP Observation Protocols to Easily and Reliably Measure Various Levels of Reformed Instructional Practice." CBE Life. Sci. Educ. 14.2 (2017). 22 June 2024 <https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-10-0168>.
BibTeX Export Format
@article{ Author = "Travis Lund and Matthew Pilarz and Jonathan Velasco and Devasmita Chakraverty and Kaitlyn Rosploch and Molly Undersander and Marilyne Stains", Title = {The Best of Both Worlds: Building on the COPUS and RTOP Observation Protocols to Easily and Reliably Measure Various Levels of Reformed Instructional Practice}, Journal = {CBE Life. Sci. Educ.}, Volume = {14}, Number = {2}, Year = {2017} }
Refer Export Format

%A Travis Lund %A Matthew Pilarz %A Jonathan Velasco %A Devasmita Chakraverty %A Kaitlyn Rosploch %A Molly Undersander %A Marilyne Stains %T The Best of Both Worlds: Building on the COPUS and RTOP Observation Protocols to Easily and Reliably Measure Various Levels of Reformed Instructional Practice %J CBE Life. Sci. Educ. %V 14 %N 2 %D 2017 %U https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-10-0168 %O application/pdf

EndNote Export Format

%0 Journal Article %A Lund, Travis %A Pilarz, Matthew %A Velasco, Jonathan %A Chakraverty, Devasmita %A Rosploch, Kaitlyn %A Undersander, Molly %A Stains, Marilyne %D 2017 %T The Best of Both Worlds: Building on the COPUS and RTOP Observation Protocols to Easily and Reliably Measure Various Levels of Reformed Instructional Practice %J CBE Life. Sci. Educ. %V 14 %N 2 %U https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-10-0168


Disclaimer: ComPADRE offers citation styles as a guide only. We cannot offer interpretations about citations as this is an automated procedure. Please refer to the style manuals in the Citation Source Information area for clarifications.

Citation Source Information

The AIP Style presented is based on information from the AIP Style Manual.

The APA Style presented is based on information from APA Style.org: Electronic References.

The Chicago Style presented is based on information from Examples of Chicago-Style Documentation.

The MLA Style presented is based on information from the MLA FAQ.

Save to my folders

Contribute

OSP Projects:
Open Source Physics - EJS Modeling
Tracker
Physlet Physics
Physlet Quantum Physics
STP Book