Conference Proceedings Detail Page
|
written by
Katherine K. Perkins,
Wendy K. Adams,
Carl E. Wieman,
Steven J. Pollock, and
Noah D. Finkelstein
It is well documented that traditional introductory physics courses often fail to teach our students the basics. Indeed, these same courses often teach students things we don't want. Beyond the usual focus on pure content, there are extensive sets of attitudes and beliefs about science that we teach our students. Some of these messages are beneficial (e.g., that science is a coherent representation of the world) while others are detrimental (e.g., the notion that women cannot be strong physicists). While decades of physics education research have reformed classroom practices to improve conceptual mastery, these same practices often fail to improve student attitudes and beliefs about learning physics. This workshop presentation introduces the development and structure of a new instrument designed to probe students' beliefs about science and learning science, the Colorado Learning About Science Survey (CLASS) [1]. In addition to exploring the various dimensions of student beliefs that this instrument probes, it examines correlations between student beliefs and class performance, students' understanding of expert beliefs, and gender differences. It also covers issues of class environments and practices that support productive beliefs.
PTEC 2007
Part of the PTEC Annual Conference series Boulder, CO: 03/02 - 03/04, 2007
ComPADRE is beta testing Citation Styles!
<a href="http://www.compadre.org/PTEC/items/detail.cfm?ID=4956">Perkins, K, W. Adams, C. Wieman, S. Pollock, and N. Finkelstein. "Attending to More than Content Mastery: assessing student attitudes and beliefs in our classrooms." Paper presented at the PTEC 2007, Boulder, CO, 03/02 - 03/04, 2007.</a>
K. Perkins, W. Adams, C. Wieman, S. Pollock, and N. Finkelstein, presented at the PTEC 2007, Boulder, CO, 2007, WWW Document, (http://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=4956&DocID=235).
K. Perkins, W. Adams, C. Wieman, S. Pollock, and N. Finkelstein, Attending to More than Content Mastery: assessing student attitudes and beliefs in our classrooms, presented at the PTEC 2007, Boulder, CO, 2007, <http://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=4956&DocID=235>.
Perkins, K., Adams, W., Wieman, C., Pollock, S., & Finkelstein, N. (2007, 03/02 - 03/04). Attending to More than Content Mastery: assessing student attitudes and beliefs in our classrooms. Paper presented at PTEC 2007, Boulder, CO. Retrieved May 19, 2013, from http://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=4956&DocID=235
Perkins, K, W. Adams, C. Wieman, S. Pollock, and N. Finkelstein. "Attending to More than Content Mastery: assessing student attitudes and beliefs in our classrooms." Paper presented at the PTEC 2007, Boulder, CO, 03/02 - 03/04, 2007. http://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=4956&DocID=235 (accessed 19 May 2013).
Perkins, Katherine, Wendy Adams, Carl Wieman, Steven Pollock, and Noah Finkelstein. "Attending to More than Content Mastery: assessing student attitudes and beliefs in our classrooms." PTEC 2007. Boulder, CO: 2007. of PTEC Annual Conference. 19 May 2013 <http://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=4956&DocID=235>.
@inproceedings{
Author = "Katherine Perkins and Wendy Adams and Carl Wieman and Steven Pollock and Noah Finkelstein",
Title = {Attending to More than Content Mastery: assessing student attitudes and beliefs in our classrooms},
BookTitle = {PTEC 2007},
Address = {Boulder, CO},
Series = {PTEC Annual Conference},
Month = {03/02 - 03/04},
Year = {2007}
}
%A Katherine Perkins %0 Conference Proceedings Disclaimer: ComPADRE offers citation styles as a guide only. We cannot offer interpretations about citations as this is an automated procedure. Please refer to the style manuals in the Citation Source Information area for clarifications.
Citation Source Information
The AIP Style presented is based on information from the AIP Style Manual. The APA Style presented is based on information from APA Style.org: Electronic References. The Chicago Style presented is based on information from Examples of Chicago-Style Documentation. The MLA Style presented is based on information from the MLA FAQ. |





