login - create an account - help

• AAPT ComPADRE
• Events
• Collaborate
• About
• Contact Us

Materials Similar to Interpreting force concept inventory scores: Normalized gain and SAT scores

• 57%: Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for Force Concept Inventory results in an introductory mechanics course
• 48%: Interpreting the force concept inventory: A response to March 1995 critique by Huffman and Heller
• 45%: Force concept inventory
• 44%: Interpreting the force concept inventory: A reply to Hestenes and Halloun
• 44%: Sensitivity of Learning Gains on the Force Concept Inventory to Students’ Individual Epistemological Changes
• 43%: Talking and learning physics: Predicting future grades from network measures and Force Concept Inventory pretest scores
• 40%: Using the Force Concept Inventory to monitor student learning and to plan teaching
• 40%: Correlations among knowledge structures, force concept inventory, and problem-solving behaviors
• 40%: Comparing large lecture mechanics curricula using the Force Concept Inventory: A five thousand student study
• 39%: Schematic concepts for schematic models of the real world: The Newtonian concept of force
• 38%: What does the force concept inventory actually measure?
• 38%: The effect of distracters on student performance on the Force Concept Inventory
• 38%: Differences in Male/Female Response Patterns on Alternative-format Versions of the Force Concept Inventory
• 38%: Context sensitivity in the force concept inventory
• 38%: Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students' representational consistency
• 38%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
• 38%: Dividing the Force Concept Inventory into two equivalent half-length tests
• 38%: Experimental validation of the half-length Force Concept Inventory
• 37%: Exploring Instructor Knowledge of Student Ideas with the Force Concept Inventory