Indicates a research-demonstrated benefit
Overview
Socratic-dialogue driven, highly-structured collaborative learning activities designed to: a) elicit students' misconceptions, b) confront their nave, incomplete, or inaccurate ideas, c) resolve these contradictions, and d) demonstrate to students the power of their conceptual models. Based on Astronomy topics faculty most often cover, require about 15-20 minutes of class time (5 minutes per page, on average), and designed for implementation in lecture courses.
| Type of Method | Curriculum supplement, Tutorials | |
|---|---|---|
| Level |
Designed for:
Astronomy Can be adapted for: Intro College Conceptual |
|
| Setting |
Designed for:
Lecture - Large (30+ students) Can be adapted for: Lecture - Small (<30 students) |
|
| Coverage | Many topics with less depth | |
| Topics | Astronomy | |
| Instructor Effort | Low | |
| Resource Needs | Cost for students | |
| Skills |
Designed for:
Conceptual understanding of physics content |
|
| Research Validation |
Based on research into:
how students learn Demonstrated to improve: scores on multiple choice conceptual tests Studied using: conceptual pre/post exams |
|
| Compatible Methods | Peer Instruction, PhET, JiTT, CGPS, Physlets, Context-Rich Problems, OSP, LA Program, CAE TPS, Astro Ranking Tasks, CPU, TEFA, Tutorials, Clickers | |
| Similar Methods | UW Tutorials, ABP Tutorials, OST Tutorials, Astro Ranking Tasks, QuILTs, Thermal Tutorials, Mechanics Tutorials, Tutorials | |
| Website | http://astronomy101.jpl.nasa.gov/teachingstrategies/teachingdetails/?StrategyID=9 |





