PERC 2010 Review Form Statistics

The Editors of the 2010 PERC Proceedings received 89 papers for the peer review section of the 2010 PERC Proceedings. 88 papers were eligible and issued for peer review. 262 of the 267 solicited peer reviews were received. The acceptance rate for the 2010 PERC Proceedings was 78.7% (70/89).

The following data details the use of each category of the 2010 PERC Proceedings Peer Review form.

1. Interest/Value to the PER Community

   

   Interest/Value to the PER Community	1 (Weak)
   Selection Count	3

   Interest/Value to the PER Community	2
   Selection Count	28

   Interest/Value to the PER Community	3
   Selection Count	50

   Interest/Value to the PER Community	4
   Selection Count	112

   Interest/Value to the PER Community	5 (Strong)
   Selection Count	67

   3 selection of 1 (Weak)
   28 selections of 2
   50 selections of 3
   112 selections of 4
   67 selections of 5 (Strong)
   

2. Content Novelty

   

   Content Novelty	1 (Weak)
   Selection Count	4

   Content Novelty	2
   Selection Count	23

   Content Novelty	3
   Selection Count	68

   Content Novelty	4
   Selection Count	105

   Content Novelty	5 (Strong)
   Selection Count	59

   4 selections of 1 (Weak)
   23 selections of 2
   68 selections of 3
   105 selections of 4
   59 selections of 5 Strong
   

3. Strength of Research

   

   Strength of Research	1 (Weak)
   Selection Count	22

   Strength of Research	2
   Selection Count	54

   Strength of Research	3
   Selection Count	64

   Strength of Research	4
   Selection Count	88

   Strength of Research	5 (Strong)
   Selection Count	31

   22 selections of 1 (Weak)
   54 selections of 2
   64 selections of 3
   88 selections of 4
   31 selections of 5 Strong
   

4. Conclusions

   

   Conclusions	1 (Weak)
   Selection Count	28

   Conclusions	2
   Selection Count	58

   Conclusions	3
   Selection Count	74

   Conclusions	4
   Selection Count	76

   Conclusions	5 (Strong)
   Selection Count	21

   28 selections of 1 (Weak)
   58 selections of 2
   74 selections of 3
   76 selections of 4
   21 selections of 5 Strong
   

5. Organization of Ideas

   

   Organization of Ideas	1 (Weak)
   Selection Count	8

   Organization of Ideas	2
   Selection Count	27

   Organization of Ideas	3
   Selection Count	53

   Organization of Ideas	4
   Selection Count	96

   Organization of Ideas	5 (Strong)
   Selection Count	74

   8 selections of 1 (Weak)
   27 selections of 2
   53 selections of 3
   96 selections of 4
   74 selections of 5 Strong
   

6. Grammar and Formatting

   

   	1 (Weak)
   Selection Count	18

   	2
   Selection Count	20

   	3
   Selection Count	38

   	4
   Selection Count	89

   	5 (Strong)
   Selection Count	94

   18 selections of 1 (Weak)
   20 selections of 2
   38 selections of 3
   89 selections of 4
   94 selections of 5 Strong
   

7. In the space below, please write your comments, criticisms, and suggestions regarding this paper. If you need additional space, please include your comments in an attached sheet.

   237 Comments Attached

   44 Supplemental Files Attached

8. Indicate your recommendation for this paper below. Due to the quick turn-around time required, manuscripts that require substantial or content-based modifications will likely be rejected.

   

   Recommendation	Do not Publish
   Selection Count	70

   Recommendation	Publish with Modifications
   Selection Count	139

   Recommendation	Publish
   Selection Count	53

   70 selections of Do not Publish
   139 selections of Publish with Minor Modifications
   53 selections of Publish
   

9. Do you think that this paper should be considered for the 2010 PERC Award?

   

   Recommendation	No
   Selection Count	225

   Recommendation	Yes
   Selection Count	31

   225 selections of No
   31 selections of Yes
   

Statistics on the use of the 2008 form and the 2009 form are also available.