PER Conference 2009 Review Form Statistics

The Editors of the 2009 PERC Proceedings received 79 papers for the peer review section of the 2009 PERC Proceedings. 235 of the 245 solicited peer reviews were received. The acceptance rate for the 2009 PERC Proceedings was 81.0% (64/79).

The following data details the use of each category of the 2009 PERC Proceedings Peer Review form.

1. Interest/Value to the PER Community

   

   Interest/Value to the PER Community	1 (Weak)
   Selection Count	2

   Interest/Value to the PER Community	2
   Selection Count	16

   Interest/Value to the PER Community	3
   Selection Count	38

   Interest/Value to the PER Community	4
   Selection Count	100

   Interest/Value to the PER Community	5 (Strong)
   Selection Count	69

   2 selection of 1 (Weak)
   16 selections of 2
   38 selections of 3
   100 selections of 4
   69 selections of 5 (Strong)
   

2. Content Novelty

   

   Content Novelty	1 (Weak)
   Selection Count	5

   Content Novelty	2
   Selection Count	17

   Content Novelty	3
   Selection Count	51

   Content Novelty	4
   Selection Count	100

   Content Novelty	5 (Strong)
   Selection Count	53

   5 selections of 1 (Weak)
   17 selections of 2
   51 selections of 3
   100 selections of 4
   53 selections of 5 Strong
   

3. Strength of Research

   

   Strength of Research	1 (Weak)
   Selection Count	13

   Strength of Research	2
   Selection Count	30

   Strength of Research	3
   Selection Count	81

   Strength of Research	4
   Selection Count	71

   Strength of Research	5 (Strong)
   Selection Count	31

   13 selections of 1 (Weak)
   30 selections of 2
   81 selections of 3
   71 selections of 4
   31 selections of 5 Strong
   

4. Conclusions

   

   Conclusions	1 (Weak)
   Selection Count	14

   Conclusions	2
   Selection Count	29

   Conclusions	3
   Selection Count	85

   Conclusions	4
   Selection Count	74

   Conclusions	5 (Strong)
   Selection Count	24

   14 selections of 1 (Weak)
   29 selections of 2
   85 selections of 3
   74 selections of 4
   24 selections of 5 Strong
   

5. Organization of Ideas

   

   Organization of Ideas	1 (Weak)
   Selection Count	7

   Organization of Ideas	2
   Selection Count	20

   Organization of Ideas	3
   Selection Count	42

   Organization of Ideas	4
   Selection Count	89

   Organization of Ideas	5 (Strong)
   Selection Count	67

   7 selections of 1 (Weak)
   20 selections of 2
   42 selections of 3
   89 selections of 4
   67 selections of 5 Strong
   

6. Grammar and Formatting

   

   	1 (Weak)
   Selection Count	5

   	2
   Selection Count	23

   	3
   Selection Count	30

   	4
   Selection Count	76

   	5 (Strong)
   Selection Count	91

   5 selections of 1 (Weak)
   23 selections of 2
   30 selections of 3
   76 selections of 4
   91 selections of 5 Strong
   

7. In the space below, please write your comments, criticisms, and suggestions regarding this paper. If you need additional space, please include your comments in an attached sheet.

   212 Comments Attached

   38 Supplemental Files Attached

8. Indicate your recommendation for this paper below. Due to the quick turn-around time required, manuscripts that require substantial or content-based modifications will likely be rejected.

   

   Recommendation	Do not Publish
   Selection Count	42

   Recommendation	Publish with Modifications
   Selection Count	130

   Recommendation	Publish
   Selection Count	55

   42 selections of Do not Publish
   130 selections of Publish with Minor Modifications
   55 selections of Publish
   

Statistics on the use of the 2008 form are also available.