The PER-Central website will be unavailable Friday evening through Saturday afternoon as electrical work occurs in the American Center of Physics server room. Down time will begin at 6PM Eastern Time on Friday. Service is expected to resume by 6PM on Saturday, July 30.

home - login - register

PERC 2008 Abstract Detail Page

Previous Page  |  New Search  |  Browse All

Abstract Title: The Roles of Evidence in Scientific Argument
Abstract: The view of science in the education community is shifting from a "rhetoric of conclusions" to a social process of knowledge construction, and engagement in scientific argumentation is a hallmark of such knowledge construction.  This emphasis on argument recasts the role of evidence and data in scientific classrooms: rather than being used to demonstrate scientific principles, it is the grounds on which claims are warranted. In this poster, I explore a transcript of scientific discourse, exploring the rules by which participants in the discourse endorse or reject scientific claims.  I appeal for a more nuanced understanding of evidence as one of many criteria by which scientific claims are evaluated, and that evidence, at times, is incommensurable with other (possibly more "scientific") criteria for evaluating claims.  This view of argumentation, and the peculiar language games associated with argumentation, is particularly relevant for understanding difficulties that diverse student populations may face.
Abstract Type: Contributed Poster
Contributed Paper Record: Contributed Paper Information
Contributed Paper Download: Download Contributed Paper

Author/Organizer Information

Primary Contact: Leslie Atkins
California State University - Chico
Department of Physics
400 W 1st St
Chico, CA 95929
Phone: 530-898-6724