Materials Similar to Interpreting the force concept inventory: A response to March 1995 critique by Huffman and Heller
- 48%: Differences in Male/Female Response Patterns on Alternative-format Versions of the Force Concept Inventory
- 45%: Force concept inventory
- 42%: What does the force concept inventory actually measure?
- 41%: Interpreting force concept inventory scores: Normalized gain and SAT scores
- 41%: Interpreting the force concept inventory: A reply to Hestenes and Halloun
- 41%: The effect of distracters on student performance on the Force Concept Inventory
- 41%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
- 40%: The Force Concept Inventory: A tool for monitoring student learning
- 40%: Context sensitivity in the force concept inventory
- 40%: Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students' representational consistency
- 38%: Comparing large lecture mechanics curricula using the Force Concept Inventory: A five thousand student study
- 37%: Comparing the force and motion conceptual evaluation and the force concept inventory
- 36%: Developing the Lunar Phases Concept Inventory
- 34%: Rasch model based analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
- 34%: Using the Lunar Phases Concept Inventory to Investigate College students' Pre-instructional Mental Models of Lunar Phases
- 34%: Using the Force Concept Inventory to monitor student learning and to plan teaching
- 34%: Gender Differences in Both Force Concept Inventory and Introductory Physics Performance
- 34%: Gender bias in the force concept inventory?
- 32%: Are They All Created Equal? A Comparison of Different Concept Inventory Development Methodologies
