Materials Similar to Establishing reliability and validity: An ongoing process
- 56%: Applying Rasch theory to evaluate the construct validity of brief electricity and magnetism assessment
- 53%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
- 45%: Item response theory analysis of the mechanics baseline test
- 44%: Aspects of Validity in Quantitative Research
- 41%: Approaches to data analysis of multiple-choice questions
- 40%: Multiple-choice test of energy and momentum concepts
- 39%: Do Concept Inventories Actually Measure Anything?
- 38%: Investigating the Validity of the MPEX Survey
- 38%: Quantum Mechanics Survey (QMS)
- 38%: Comparing students' performance on research-based conceptual assessments and traditional classroom assessments
- 38%: Multidimensional Student Skills with Collaborative Filtering
- 37%: What does the force concept inventory actually measure?
- 37%: Analysis of Student Understanding of Statics Principles
- 36%: Development of a Mechanics Reasoning Inventory
- 35%: Tapping into Juniors’ Understanding of E&M: The Colorado Upper-Division Electrostatics (CUE) Diagnostic
- 34%: Evaluating an electricity and magnetism assessment tool: Brief electricity and magnetism assessment
- 34%: Comparing the force and motion conceptual evaluation and the force concept inventory
- 34%: Multiple roles of assessment in upper-division physics course reforms
- 34%: Development of the Concise Data Processing Assessment
