home - login - register

Journal Article Detail Page

Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research
written by Lin Ding, Neville W. Reay, Albert Lee, and Lei Bao
Pre-testing and post-testing is a commonly used method in Physics Education Research to assess student learning gains. It is well recognized in the community that timings and incentives in delivering conceptual tests can impact test results. However, it is difficult to control these variables across different studies. As a common practice, a pre-test is often administered either at or near the beginning of a course, while a post-test can be given either at or near the end of a course. Also, in conducting such tests there often is no norm as to whether incentives should be offered to students. Because these variations can significantly affect test results, it is important to study and document their impact. We analyzed five years of data that were collected at The Ohio State University from over 2100 students, who took both the pre-test and post-test of the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism under various timings and incentives. We observed that the actual time frame for giving a test has a marked effect on the test results and that incentive granting also has a significant influence on test outcomes. These results suggest that one should carefully monitor and document the conditions under which tests are administered.
Subjects ADS Supplements Resource Types
Education - Basic Research
- Assessment
General Physics
- Physics Education Research
- Reference Material
= Research study
PER-Central Type Intended Users Ratings
- PER Literature
- Researchers
  • Currently 0.0/5

Want to rate this material?
Login here!


Formats:
application/pdf
text/html
Access Rights:
Limited free access
Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited
Restriction:
© 2008 The American Physical Society
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010112
ISSN Number:
1554-9178
NSF Number:
0618128
PACSs:
01.40.Fk
01.40.gf
Keywords:
CSEM, E&M, electricity and magnetism, incentives, test time
Record Creator:
Metadata instance created July 4, 2008 by Lyle Barbato
Record Updated:
July 14, 2013 by Lyle Barbato
Last Update
when Cataloged:
June 9, 2008
ComPADRE is beta testing Citation Styles!

Record Link
AIP Format
L. Ding, N. Reay, A. Lee, and L. Bao, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 4 (1), 010112 (2008), WWW Document, (http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010112).
AJP/PRST-PER
L. Ding, N. Reay, A. Lee, and L. Bao, Effects of testing conditions on conceptual survey results, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 4 (1), 010112 (2008), <http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010112>.
APA Format
Ding, L., Reay, N., Lee, A., & Bao, L. (2008, June 9). Effects of testing conditions on conceptual survey results. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res., 4(1), 010112. Retrieved November 20, 2014, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010112
Chicago Format
Ding, L, N. Reay, A. Lee, and L. Bao. "Effects of testing conditions on conceptual survey results." Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 4, no. 1, (June 9, 2008): 010112, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010112 (accessed 20 November 2014).
MLA Format
Ding, Lin, Neville Reay, Albert Lee, and Lei Bao. "Effects of testing conditions on conceptual survey results." Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 4.1 (2008): 010112. 20 Nov. 2014 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010112>.
BibTeX Export Format
@article{ Author = "Lin Ding and Neville Reay and Albert Lee and Lei Bao", Title = {Effects of testing conditions on conceptual survey results}, Journal = {Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.}, Volume = {4}, Number = {1}, Pages = {010112}, Month = {June}, Year = {2008} }
Refer Export Format

%A Lin Ding
%A Neville Reay
%A Albert Lee
%A Lei Bao
%T Effects of testing conditions on conceptual survey results
%J Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
%V 4
%N 1
%D June 9, 2008
%P 010112
%U http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010112
%O application/pdf

EndNote Export Format

%0 Journal Article
%A Ding, Lin
%A Reay, Neville
%A Lee, Albert
%A Bao, Lei
%D June 9, 2008
%T Effects of testing conditions on conceptual survey results
%J Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
%V 4
%N 1
%P 010112
%8 June 9, 2008
%@ 1554-9178
%U http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010112


Disclaimer: ComPADRE offers citation styles as a guide only. We cannot offer interpretations about citations as this is an automated procedure. Please refer to the style manuals in the Citation Source Information area for clarifications.

Citation Source Information

The AIP Style presented is based on information from the AIP Style Manual.

The AJP/PRST-PER presented is based on the AIP Style with the addition of journal article titles and conference proceeding article titles.

The APA Style presented is based on information from APA Style.org: Electronic References.

The Chicago Style presented is based on information from Examples of Chicago-Style Documentation.

The MLA Style presented is based on information from the MLA FAQ.

Save to my folders

Contribute

Similar Materials