Astronomy Center.org


home - login - register - about - sitemap
advanced search

Website Detail Page

written by Andrew Fraknoi
published by the Astronomical Society of the Pacific
This is a selected list of resources for those who want to examine with a skeptical eye some of the claims at the fringes of science that seem connected to astronomy. Andrew Fraknoi's collected resources include suggested books and websites for further reading on astrology, crop circles, the moon landing controversy, UFOs, and other subjects.

This item is part of a larger set of resources and educational materials compiled and edited by the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.
Subjects Levels Resource Types
Astronomy
- Cosmology
- Historical Astronomy
= Philosophy of Science
- Solar System
- Informal Education
- High School
- Middle School
- Lower Undergraduate
- Professional Development
- Collection
- Instructional Material
= Curriculum support
- Reference Material
= Bibliography
Intended Users Formats Ratings
- Learners
- Educators
- Parent/Guardians
- General Publics
- text/html
- application/pdf
  • Currently 0.0/5

Want to rate this material?
Login here!


Access Rights:
Free access
Restriction:
© 2009 Andrew Fraknoi, Foothill College, and Astronomical Society of the Pacific
Can be freely used for any educational nonprofit purpose, as long as full author credit is given in all copies.
Keywords:
Erich Von Daniken, Immanuel Velikovsky, UFO, Velikovsky, aliens, astrology, astronomy bibliography, bibliographies, crop circles, myths, reading lists, resource guide, science fiction, superstition
Record Cloner:
Metadata instance created March 9, 2010 by Caroline Hall
Record Updated:
January 19, 2011 by Lyle Barbato
Last Update
when Cataloged:
July 10, 2008
Other Collections:

AAAS Benchmark Alignments (2008 Version)

1. The Nature of Science

1B. Scientific Inquiry
  • 3-5: 1B/E4. Scientists do not pay much attention to claims about how something they know about works unless the claims are backed up with evidence that can be confirmed, along with a logical argument.
1C. The Scientific Enterprise
  • 6-8: 1C/M7. Accurate record-keeping, openness, and replication are essential for maintaining an investigator's credibility with other scientists and society.
  • 9-12: 1C/H7. The strongly held traditions of science, including its commitment to peer review and publication, serve to keep the vast majority of scientists well within the bounds of ethical professional behavior. Deliberate deceit is rare and likely to be exposed sooner or later by the scientific enterprise itself. When violations of these scientific ethical traditions are discovered, they are strongly condemned by the scientific community, and the violators then have difficulty regaining the respect of other scientists.

AAAS Benchmark Alignments (1993 Version)

1. THE NATURE OF SCIENCE

B. Scientific Inquiry
  • 1B (6-8) #3.  What people expect to observe often affects what they actually do observe. Strong beliefs about what should happen in particular circumstances can prevent them from detecting other results. Scientists know about this danger to objectivity and take steps to try and avoid it when designing investigations and examining data. One safeguard is to have different investigators conduct independent studies of the same questions.
ComPADRE is beta testing Citation Styles!

Record Link
AIP Format
A. Fraknoi, (Astronomical Society of the Pacific, San Francisco, 2009), WWW Document, (http://www.astrosociety.org/education/resources/pseudobib.html).
AJP/PRST-PER
A. Fraknoi, Astronomical Pseudo-Science: A Skeptic's Resource List (Astronomical Society of the Pacific, San Francisco, 2009), <http://www.astrosociety.org/education/resources/pseudobib.html>.
APA Format
Fraknoi, A. (2008, July 10). Astronomical Pseudo-Science: A Skeptic's Resource List. Retrieved August 29, 2014, from Astronomical Society of the Pacific: http://www.astrosociety.org/education/resources/pseudobib.html
Chicago Format
Fraknoi, Andrew. Astronomical Pseudo-Science: A Skeptic's Resource List. San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific, July 10, 2008. http://www.astrosociety.org/education/resources/pseudobib.html (accessed 29 August 2014).
MLA Format
Fraknoi, Andrew. Astronomical Pseudo-Science: A Skeptic's Resource List. San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 2009. 10 July 2008. 29 Aug. 2014 <http://www.astrosociety.org/education/resources/pseudobib.html>.
BibTeX Export Format
@misc{ Author = "Andrew Fraknoi", Title = {Astronomical Pseudo-Science: A Skeptic's Resource List}, Publisher = {Astronomical Society of the Pacific}, Volume = {2014}, Number = {29 August 2014}, Month = {July 10, 2008}, Year = {2009} }
Refer Export Format

%A Andrew Fraknoi
%T Astronomical Pseudo-Science: A Skeptic's Resource List
%D July 10, 2008
%I Astronomical Society of the Pacific
%C San Francisco
%U http://www.astrosociety.org/education/resources/pseudobib.html
%O text/html

EndNote Export Format

%0 Electronic Source
%A Fraknoi, Andrew
%D July 10, 2008
%T Astronomical Pseudo-Science: A Skeptic's Resource List
%I Astronomical Society of the Pacific
%V 2014
%N 29 August 2014
%8 July 10, 2008
%9 text/html
%U http://www.astrosociety.org/education/resources/pseudobib.html


Disclaimer: ComPADRE offers citation styles as a guide only. We cannot offer interpretations about citations as this is an automated procedure. Please refer to the style manuals in the Citation Source Information area for clarifications.

Citation Source Information

The AIP Style presented is based on information from the AIP Style Manual.

The APA Style presented is based on information from APA Style.org: Electronic References.

The Chicago Style presented is based on information from Examples of Chicago-Style Documentation.

The MLA Style presented is based on information from the MLA FAQ.

Save to my folders

Supplements

Contribute